When talking about art, we often stumble over the word "competition." Prizes, awards, rankings, auctions: everything seems to measure the value of creative expression. But who decides what's "best" in something born from the soul and speaking directly to the uniqueness of each individual?
Society and the illusion of comparison
We live in a world where every field is subject to metrics: views, sales, reviews. Even art, which should eschew these patterns, is often judged by numbers and acclaim. This creates a subtle, invisible competition that can generate frustration, insecurity, and fruitless comparisons between artists.
Diversity as a wealth, not as an obstacle
Every artist has a distinct voice. Picasso couldn't compete with Van Gogh, nor could Frida Kahlo compete with Basquiat. They were simply different, as different are the paths to beauty. An abstract work can stir profound emotions in the viewer, while a hyperrealist landscape can convey the stillness of a soul. There is no ladder to climb, only horizons to explore.
Art as a dialogue, not as a competition
Art is a space for communication, not conflict. Artists engage with the public, with themselves, and even with other creatives, without needing to decide who is right or who deserves more. Even dissent, misunderstanding, and provocation are part of the game: what matters is authentic participation, not winning a medal.
Conclusion
In art, there is no competition. There are only different ways of expressing oneself, different points of view, different inner needs. Art is freedom, it is exploration, it is breathing space. It is the language of the soul that knows no podiums, but only paths.